Penalty? Red card? Why were they given against England?

England were reduced to 10 men in their crucial World Cup last-16 match with Mexico and also had a controversial penalty awarded against them in a lively encounter at the Azteca Stadium.

The Three Lions led 2-0 in the first half thanks to two goals in as many minutes from Jude Bellingham, but Julian Quinones pulled a goal back just before the break.

However, the game exploded into life in the second half with two big moments.

First Jarell Quansah was sent off in the 54th minute after a review by the video assistant referee showed he clearly went in on Jesus Gallardo with his studs up.

The moment briefly buoyed Mexico's fans but England soon went 3-1 up when Harry Kane converted a penalty.

"It is a clear red card," Darren Cann, the 2010 World Cup final assistant referee said on BBC One.

"Quansah does play the ball first but that doesn't matter in the laws of the game.

"He goes through and you can clearly see the studs on the shin. The referee has no choice but to show the red card.

"100% a red card."

England restored their two goal advantage when Harry Kane converted a penalty, but Mexico again fought back when they were awarded a spot-kick.

Kane appeared to clip Brian Gutierrez and after referee Alireza Faghani went to the monitor to review the incident he awarded a penalty, which Raul Jimenez converted.

"It is a penalty," added Cann.

"Kane unfortunately does kick the Mexico player's foot. It is a little bit similar to the [Luka] Modric kick which England got a penalty for in the first group game. Kane is unaware of the player coming in behind."

Former England goalkeeper Joe Hart felt all the key decisions made were correct.

"I think the referee has come to the right decision on all three [both penalties and the red card]," he said on BBC One.

"I felt every single one... as soon as I saw the replays, my heart was in my mouth. Quansah deserved to go, Kane didn't get the ball and Gordon [for the England penalty] got to the ball first."